• Home
  • Archive
  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
  • May 9, 2025

The Madison Times

The Paper That's More Than Black and White

  • News
    • Local News
    • National News
    • International News
    • Sports News
    • Education News
  • Columns
    • Columnists
    • Editorials
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Life Lessons with Alex Gee
  • Events
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Lifestyle
  • Classifieds
  • Community
    • Middle Spread
  • Milwaukee
EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED, THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THE MADISON TIMES

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Supremes to Look at Ohio Purging Nonvoters

January 13, 2018

By Gloria J. Browne-Marshall

Civil rights groups argue that when Ohio purged names of nonvoters it violated Federal law. Ohio counters that it is purging names to prevent voter fraud. On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear this troubling voting rights case.

When Larry Harmon tried to vote in 2015 he discovered his name had been purged from the voting records. Although Mr. Harmon has lived in the same home for over 16 years Ohio removed him from the voting lists. He had chosen not to vote in 2009 and 2010. Nor had he returned a post card notice asking if he was a resident. Based on Ohio law, Mr. Harmon and thousands of other registered voters were then unknowingly purged from voting lists. He was turned away at the polls.

Mr. Harmon, along with the A. Philip Randolph Institute (APRI) and the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, filed a lawsuit seeking to stop Ohio from removing the names of registered voters from voter rolls. They argued that purging the names was a violation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.  They demanded Ohio reinstate otherwise eligible voters who were improperly removed from the rolls pursuant to the Supplemental Process or to count provisional ballots cast by such persons.

There is no law against not voting. Nor should there be a punishment, says lawyers with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. Americans have a right to not vote. The lower court agreed, ruling Ohio used a voter’s failure to vote as the “trigger” for sending a confirmation notice to that voter meaning it is indeed a failure to vote or voter inactivity that begins the purging process.

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) were intended to increase voter participation by making it easier to register to vote. These laws led to more voter registration outlets, such as the Department of Motor Vehicles. The NVRA and HAVA also prevent States from removing names in a manner that is discriminatory. Moreover, NVRA and HAVA specifically say that States cannot remove names “from the official list of voters registered to vote in an election for Federal office by reason of the person’s failure to vote.”

However, Ohio countered that States must maintain accurate records. In the lower court, Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, argued that voter names are not removed for failing to vote. They are removed for failing to respond to a written notice and then not voting in two Federal elections. Ohio assumes the person has moved or died and the name is purged in order to prevent voter fraud and to keep up to date voting records.

Former Attorney General Eric Holder, members of the Congressional Black Caucus, the NAACP and the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights filed briefs supporting Mr. Harmon and the A. Philip Randolph Institute. While Georgia and several other “Red States” filed briefs in support of Ohio. This is the second voting rights case the Court will hear this term.

The A. Philip Randolph Institute has been “supporting voting rights for decades,” says Andre Washington, Ohio State president of APRI. APRI was founded by A. Philip Randolph (1889-1979), a Black labor leader and civil rights activist and Bayard Rustin (1912-1987), a Black labor strategist and civil rights organizer. The Court’s decision in Husted v. Harmon is expected by June.

_____

Gloria J. Browne-Marshall is a U.S. Supreme Court syndicated columnist, associate professor at John Jay College, and author of several books including “The Voting Rights War.”

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Popular Interests In This Article: Gloria J. Browne-Marshall

Read More - Related Articles

  • Law of the Land
  • Clarence Thomas is in Trouble – Again
  • Charge Buffalo Massacre Defendant Under Anti-Lynching Law
  • “SHOT” – The Drama of InJustice
  • “Electoral College Drama Ahead – Pence Must Announce Biden Wins”


Connect With Us

Become Our Fan On Facebook
Find Us On Facebook


Follow Us On Twitter
Follow Us On Twitter

Editorials

Karma Chavez
Amanda Zhang
Julianne Malveaux
Benjamin Chavis
George Curry

Journalists

Jacklin Bolduan
Brianna Rae
Aarushi Agni
Rob Franklin
Claire Miller

Topics

Brown Girl Green $
Young Gifted & Black
Universally Speaking
Ask Progress
Civil Rights

Topics

Police Shooting
Police Brutality
Black Lives Matter
NAACP
Racism

Politicians

Barack Obama
Hillary Clinton
Gwen Moore
Paul Soglin
Scott Walker

Contact Us

Phone:
414-449-4860

Copyright © 2025 Courier Communications. All Rights Reserved.
We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.